Here's a concrete example from far return (RETF). The microcode needs to determine whether this is a same-privilege or cross-privilege return, because the two cases require very different handling. Following execution order (not address order):
第八十七条 旅馆业、饮食服务业、文化娱乐业、出租汽车业等单位的人员，在公安机关查处吸毒、赌博、卖淫、嫖娼活动时，为违法犯罪行为人通风报信的，或者以其他方式为上述活动提供条件的，处十日以上十五日以下拘留；情节较轻的，处五日以下拘留或者一千元以上二千元以下罚款。。关于这个话题，Line官方版本下载提供了深入分析
。业内人士推荐Line官方版本下载作为进阶阅读
第三条 扰乱公共秩序，妨害公共安全，侵犯人身权利、财产权利，妨害社会管理，具有社会危害性，依照《中华人民共和国刑法》的规定构成犯罪的，依法追究刑事责任；尚不够刑事处罚的，由公安机关依照本法给予治安管理处罚。。heLLoword翻译官方下载对此有专业解读
The common pattern across all of these seems to be filesystem and network ACLs enforced by the OS, not a separate kernel or hardware boundary. A determined attacker who already has code execution on your machine could potentially bypass Seatbelt or Landlock restrictions through privilege escalation. But that is not the threat model. The threat is an AI agent that is mostly helpful but occasionally careless or confused, and you want guardrails that catch the common failure modes - reading credentials it should not see, making network calls it should not make, writing to paths outside the project.